John Fitzgerald Kennedy was elected the president of the United States of America in 1960 at a immature age. At that clip. the General Eisenhower was ageing. He was known for his frequent bosom onslaughts and his love for golf than he was. for his resistance to the military industrial complex particularly among the immature people. At the same period. the immature coevals had a sense of optimism. that nil was impossible and that no job could travel unsolved. The clip had come for the older coevals who had made errors to travel over and allow the new comers find solutions to the jobs that faced Americans.
They did non desire to reiterate the errors that the older coevals had done. like the wars and the campaigns against the ‘red menace’ . These thoughts motivated their white protagonists and the black pupils from the South who were fed up with the policies that ruled them earlier. As a immature Catholic politician. JFK. together with a immature black Baptist curate. Martin Luther King. expressed their high hopes and the dreams for the epoch of the immature coevals to govern.
William Terence says that it was this immature coevals that had loyally pledged commitment to the flag each forenoon in school. and it was in the schools across the state that they were told of the alone promise of America. While the grownups were concerned with leisure. the immature coevals. who had been invariably reminded in high school of their fortunate position as citizens of the wealthiest democratic society in the universe. was determined to do the American dream go a world. ( William T. M. R. . 1997. pgs 57-58 )
President Kennedy’s cause on civil rights Harmonizing Garth E. Pauley in the book. “The modern presidential term and civil rights” . President Kennedy was known as the title-holder of civil rights and the leader of a ‘second reconstruction’ . His attitude towards the civil rights has been considered irrational. It is said that he was non knowing on the civil rights because they were alien to most of his experience. He was from a privileged life style that did non supply him with a deep cognition or feelings about the racial biass that his fellow citizens possessed.
He besides had small interaction with black people in Boston or in Hyanisport except as retainers. However. meetings with the African Americans leaders seemed to progress the president a small in his ain committedness to human rights. He was sympathetic of the many jobs facing the inkinesss. and hence worked to guarantee the transition of the lodging. employment. revenue enhancement and instruction steps to assist better the fortunes for the black people. ( Pauley Garth E. . 2001. pgs 105-112 )
In 1963. Kennedy finally took strong action on civil rights and spoke about the moral jussive mood of racial inequality. In making so. he needed to fulfill the mark of Americans. who protested against drawn-out federal inactivity. decrease in the potency for racial force and effort to keep the scintilla of assurance that the African Americans still had in the federal authorities. President Kennedy besides wanted to help the moderate civil rights leaders like Roy Wilkins. Martin Luther King. Jr.
and James Farmer in procuring their aims lest the motion be taken over by groups. He besides led the battle for civil right in order to forestall the isolation of black leading and the embitterment of the African American people. ( Pauley Garth E. . 2001. pgs 105-112 ) JFK’s nucleus beliefs President Kennedy was a adult male with nucleus beliefs refering certain issues environing humanity. An illustration of such beliefs is his base on war and the Cuban missile crisis in 1943. His antipathy to war was more marked during the first decennaries of the atomic epoch.
Equally early as 1947. the 29 twelvemonth old fresher and congresswoman was gripped by the intensifying intuitions of the cold war. which drove him to warn of the atomic apocalypse publically. In his ain words. he said that. “The greatest danger is a war which would be waged by the witting determination of the leaders of Russia some 25 or 35 old ages from now. She will hold the atomic bomb. the planes. the ports. and the ships to pay aggressive war outside her lodgers. Such struggle would truly intend the terminal of the universe and all our diplomatic negotiations and supplications must be exerted to avoid it.
” His words demo his nucleus belief on war. that it is immoral and cold. Austere Sheldon M. . 2003. pg 40 ) In the book Debaring the ‘final failure’ . Sheldon says that in all of president Kennedy’s life. he had a high respect for personal bravery and stamina. but at the same clip. he loathed the ferociousness and the slaughter of war. He besides had a profound historical paradox ; that human existences had ne’er been capable of constructing a peaceful and stable universe. but at the same clip. war. particularly between states possessing atomic arms. was no longer a rational option.
The president was besides an anti-communist merely like his missile crisis advisors. but he understood that one time military struggle was unleashed between the atomic world powers. all stakes were away. ( Austere Sheldon M. . 2003. pg 41 ) The Cuban missile crisis provided the supreme trial of President Kennedy’s capacity to hold an unfastened head and. at the same clip. to keep fast his nucleus beliefs about war in the face of dogged force per unit area from the experts around him. ( Austere Sheldon M. . 2003. pgs 41 ) The president besides believed in autonomy and in making what one wanted to make. He was an jock. a household adult male. and the Pulitzer Prize- winning writer.
He did anything he wanted to make. and hence his determination to prosecute himself in political relations at such a immature age. ( Gramm Kent. 2001. pg 183 ) Consequence of Catholic background to JFK’s regulation Religion is one of the critical elements emphasized particularly by the Democrats in presidential term. who confess that they must retain the trust of God fearing Americans. In 1960. The Democratic Party appointed John. F. Kennedy as their presidential campaigner. despite him being a Catholic. but most of his protagonists Protestants. He was the 2nd Catholic to have the presidential nomination after Alfred E.
Smith of New York. 30 two old ages earlier. Smith suffered a annihilating licking after a run that was marred by barbarous spiritual dogmatism. Given this history. JFK addressed a address before 100s of Southern Baptist spiritual leaders in Houston. Texas. on September 12. 1960. In his address. he expressed his declinations in the necessity of faith to the American presidential campaigners. He said that there were other more of import issues that could be considered to assist make up one’s mind who the president should be. like hungriness. disease and inequality. ( North David. 2004. pgs 97-99 )
He added that issues like war. hungriness. ignorance and desperation knew no spiritual barriers. But since his Catholic background had had made faith an issue in the run. Kennedy said that. “it is seemingly necessary for me to province one time again- non what sort of church I believe in for that should be of import merely to me. but what sort of America I believe in. ” He besides said. “I believe in an America where the separation of church and province is absolute. where no Catholic archpriest would state the president ( should he be a Catholic ) how to move and no Protestant curate would state his parishioners for whom to vote… .
” He farther stated that his construct of America was one in which “no public functionary either petitions or accepts direction on public policy from the Pope. the National Council of Churches or any other ecclesiastical source” and “where no spiritual organic structure seeks to enforce its will straight or indirectly upon the general public or the public Acts of the Apostless of its functionaries. ” President Kennedy believed that faith should be a president’s ain matter and should non impact American policies or the manner he regulations. ( North David. 2004. pgs 97-99 )
JFK’s decease and its consequence on the civil right motions On November 22nd. 1963. the civil right motion received a oppressing blow of JFK’s decease. The president was solidly behind the civil right attempts and was actively forcing Congress for the transition of a major rights measure. This measure would do possible full equality among the African Americans and the Whites. On a visit to Dallas. as President Kennedy rode with his married woman Jackie in a exchangeable in a parade. three shootings rang out. hitting Kennedy in the caput and cervix. The president died shortly after.
The decease of the president made the hereafter of the civil rights statute law uncertain. It was nevertheless ironical that the decease of the president strengthened the proposed civil right measure. an advantage to the civil rights motions. Prior to his decease. any civil rights statute law would hold required important via media to go through both houses of Congress. After his decease. President Johnson ( his replacement ) refused to compromise. The civil right Acts were besides boosted by the fact that the presidential election was upcoming. and Johnson strongly endorsed the Civil Rights Act.
With cardinal Republicans emerging as Alliess and other jurisprudence shapers less inclined to quibble over a measure an assassinated president supported. the measure passed both houses of Congress with no important alterations. Subsequently on. President Johnson passed the Civil Rights Act into jurisprudence. Consequence of John. F. Kennedy’s presidential term in the twenty-first century Today. the values of John F. Kennedy are apparent. an illustration being the election of President Barack Obama. President John. F. Kennedy fought for equality among the African Americans and the Whites. In the 1960. it was impossible for a black adult male to go the president.
All this started to alter when President Kennedy pushed for the passing of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. His blackwash was a encouragement to passing of the measure. signaling the beginning of equality among all. The election of president Obama was decidedly a reaping of fruits from the seeds sown by President JFK. The policies of President John F. Kennedy are seen in consequence today. where equality reigns among all Americans. regardless of their cultural background. race or colour. The fact that President Obama became president at 47 old ages could besides be an inspiration by President Kennedy.
In 1960. when John Kennedy was elected president. he received a batch of support from the immature people. The old leading had failed ; the policies used so were just. John F. Kennedy’s epoch was the start of the immature leadership’s regulation. He gave hope to the immature and to the black African Americans. and was determined to achieve the American dream. This was the instance with the recent election. Most people preferred a immature president to being ruled by an aged individual. President Obama gave America a hope. and promised to force America to accomplish the American dream. Merely as the young persons back uping President John F.
Kennedy believed. that nil was impossible. so did the election of president Obama prove. The election of Obama’s election was besides boosted by the fact that the Americans were fed up with Bush’s policies. which were besides similar to those of John McCain. ( Curtis Mark. etal. 2009. pgs 107-108 ) References 1 ) Curtis Mark. Owens Ronn. Age of Obama: A Reporter’s Journey with Clinton. McCain and Obama in the Making of the President. 2008. Agile Books LLC. 2009. pgs 107-108 2 ) Gramm Kent. November: Lincoln’s lament at Gettysburg. Indiana University Press. 2001. pg 183
3 ) North David. The crisis of American democracy: the presidential elections of 2000 and 2004. Mehring Books. 2004. pgs 97-99 4 ) Pauley Garth E. . The modern presidential term & A ; civil rights: rhetoric on race from Roosevelt to Nixon. Texas A & A ; M University Press. 2001. pgs 105-112 5 ) Penrice Ronda Racha. African American History for Dummies. For Dummies. 2007. pg 169 6 ) Stern Sheldon M. . Debaring ‘the concluding failure’ : John F. Kennedy and the secret Cuban Missile Crisis meetings. Stanford University Press. 2003. pgs 40-41 7 ) William Terence Martin Riches. The civil rights motion: battle and opposition. Palgrave Macmillan. 1997. pgs 57-58