Site Loader

Each of the four revivalists had a peculiar angle to their authorship: – One could state that Mark was a brief history of the sermon of Peter. John’s Gospel was written “that you may come to believe that Jesus is the Messiah. the Son of God. and that through believing you may hold life in his name” ( John 20:31 ) . Matthew was written for Jews to demo how Jesus’ learning related to their Torahs and traditions. And Luke wrote for those who had become adherents and wanted to anchor their religion in historical fact. Luke is described in the rubric of Jean-Francois Racine’s 20008 article as ‘Luke: Storyteller. Interpreter and Evangelist.

’ Despite his accomplishments as both storyteller and translator of events. he would hold possibly felt most comfy with the last of these – Evangelist. In his Gospel he makes many theological points – he was concerned for case that his readers knew precisely who the individual of Jesus was – non as Alan Richardson says ‘a docetic apparition’ i. e the belief. subsequently considered dissident. that Christ simply appeared to hold a human organic structure. an thought that Luke opposes with his birth narrations and the family tree in chapter 3.

Nor is he ‘a heathen theophany’ i. e. the mere seeable. but non material visual aspect of God. This world of God in history can be seen in the reading of this transition. Jesus is non merely reading an old prognostication. He is puting claim to it. It is non to be interpreted as ’The Spirit of the Lord ‘ is upon some unknown individual. some hereafter long promised Saviour. but upon Jesus. the male child they had all seen grow up. It is possibly no admiration the fold found this hard to accept.

God in adult male. yet non person who would execute miracles merely to turn out a point as is made clear in the description of the enticements in the wilderness. yet who is prepared to uncover marks that can be interpreted. The delivery of sight to the blind was in peculiar something associated with ‘the retainer of the Lord’ harmonizing to Richardson and would be seen as a Messianic mark. It is clear from the words of Isaiah that he chose that he saw the miracles he was able to execute as marks of the coming of the land of God ‘the twenty-four hours of the Lord predicted by Isaiah.

He makes this clear when he follows his reading by doing the amazing claim ‘Today this Bible is fulfilled in your hearing’ . After the prologue ( Luke 1 poetry 1 to 4 ) Luke’s Gospel can be divided most evidently into 5 chief subdivisions in a frame work that more or less follows that set out by Mark. but which includes many events recorded entirely by Luke: – • Births of John and Jesus. Luke chapters 1 V 5 and 2. and alone to Luke • Galilean Ministry. ( this subdivision would besides include his baptism and family tree ) .

The family tree excessively is alone. for although Matthew includes such a list they vary. This subdivision concludes at Chapter 9 V 20 with Peter’s confession when he acknowledges Jesus as ‘God’s Messiah’ . • The fable of the Good Samaritan in chapter 10 begins the following subdivision wherein Jesus bit by bit moves towards Jerusalem. • Luke 19 V 28 Markss Jesus’ entry into the metropolis of Jerusalem and a re-joining of Luke’s narrative with that contained in Mark’s shorter Gospel.

Although there are histories of earlier confrontations. in peculiar with the Pharisees this subdivision marks a period of greater confrontation. as when he drove out the merchandisers in the temple in Luke 19 V 45-48 and of class subsequently with the Sanhedrin and the Roman swayers. • The passion narrations can be said to get down from Chapter 22 with the banquet of unraised staff of life and the readyings for the last supper with the adherents. They conclude with the Ascension. described once more in Acts 1. . The nazarene at the point described in 4 V 14 -30 has returned to his place town of Nazareth in Galilee.

It is a transition that place Christ right at the Centre of the narrative of redemption. Harmonizing to Conzelmann and Buswell in the subdivision of their 1992 book entitled ‘The Centre of history’ Luke ‘deliberately takes the “today” which is expressed in this transition as belonging to the yesteryear. and builds up the image of Jesus’ whole calling on the footing of this historical reading. ’ “Today” might non really be included in the transition in most interlingual renditions. but is still implied as the transition is in the present tense and in the concluding line as in the Message paraphrasis ‘This is God’s twelvemonth to move.

’ In the Amplified Bible the transition reads: – The Spirit of the Lord [ is ] upon Me. because He has anointed Me [ the Anointed One. the Messiah ] to prophesy the good intelligence ( the Gospel ) to the hapless ; He has sent Me to denote release to the prisoners and recovery of sight to the blind. to direct Forth as delivered those who are oppressed [ who are downtrodden. bruised. crushed. and interrupt down by catastrophe ] . To proclaim the recognized and acceptable twelvemonth of the Lord [ the twenty-four hours when redemption and the free favours of God abundantly abound.

Headings in the Good News Bible for this transition are ‘Jesus begins his work in Galilee’ and ‘Jesus is rejected at Nazareth’ The local people would hold heard about the miracles don vitamin E in other topographic points in the part. They must hold been believing ‘If he has done so much in other small towns. how much more will he make here’ Alternatively he quotes to them a good known adage: – “Surely you will cite this adage to me: ‘Physician. mend yourself! Do here in your hometown what we have heard that you did in Capernaum.

I tell you the truth. ” he continued. “no prophesier is accepted in his hometown. He goes on to elaborate upon the manner in which Gentiles could hold faith. giving the illustrations of the widow of Zarephath who had been helped by Elijah. and besides Naaman the Syrian. both of whose narratives would hold been familiar to the fold. The transition has been proceeded by the birth narrations. the history of the early visit to Jerusalem. the sudden leap to the sermon of his precursor John.

His baptism is recorded briefly and so comes the family tree which traces Jesus’ lineage back to God The enticement in the wilderness is described as instantly predating the events of 4 Vs 14 – 30. So we have Jesus. a alone being. ‘Today in the town of David a Saviour has been born to you ; he is the Christ. the Lord. ’ And. harmonizing to the words of Simeon. non merely a Jesus for the Judaic people. but besides ‘Salvation which you have prepared in the sight of all people. a visible radiation for disclosure to the Gentiles and for glorification to your people Israel.

’ It had been traditionally expected that Elijah would return before the coming of the Messiah as is pointed out by Luke by his inclusion of the prognostication from Isaiah ‘A voice of one naming in the desert. fix the manner for the Lord… . . the crooked roads shall go consecutive. the unsmooth ways smooth. and all world will see God’s redemption. ’ So one time once more the image provoked is of a catholicity to the message of redemption. John the Baptist is an Elijah type figure. particularly if one reads Mark’s description of him. ‘John wore vesture made of camel’s hair. with a leather belt round his waist. and he ate locusts and wild honey.

’ The baptism was a public event. but harmonizing to Luke the message from God to his boy was a personal 1. and it is non clear in this transition whether others heard the voice ‘You are my boy whom I love ; with you I am good pleased. ’ . a parallel transition to the 1 in Mark. but in John it is clear that John the Baptist at least was a informant. ‘John gave this testimony: ” I saw the Spirit come down from heaven as a dove and remain on him. ”’ Matthew gives a somewhat different version of events. which seems to connote that God was publicly admiting Jesus as his boy.

‘A voice from heaven said “This is my boy. whom I love. with him I am good pleased. ”’ So all is ready – Jesus is established in history as being God on Earth. the particular. alone individual. prophesied of old as the agencies of the world’s redemption – now he can get down. Which brings us to the Nazareth temple scene which marks. every bit far as Luke is concerned. the beginning of the public ministry of Jesus. How far does passage put the docket for the ministry of Jesus?

Harmonizing to Hans Conzelmann and Geoffrey Buswell in the 1982 book ‘TheTheology of St Luke’ ‘It is important that harmonizing to Luke Jesus is non ‘led by’ the Spirit. but himself acts ‘in the Spirit’ . First of all there is the obvious contrast between ‘He taught in their temples and everyone praised him’ which refers in a general manner to the temples of assorted Galilean towns. and the reaction in his place town of Nazareth. presumptively before a fold of those who knew him good: -‘Isn’t this Jesus. Joseph’s boy?

’ and so when he expounded on the transition. indicating out how Elijah had non been sent to a Judaic place in the clip of dearth. but to assist the Gentile widow of Zarephath in Sidon. this provoked an highly violent negative reaction ‘All the people in the temple were ferocious when they heard this’ so much so that they were seemingly prepared to really kill him harmonizing to versify 28 and 29. Why such a violent reaction? Israel had long been anticipating her Messiah.

He had been prophesied from Genesis through to Malachi. but in both negative and positive ways ‘ I will set hostility between you and the adult female. and between your progeny and hers’ and ‘Suddenly the Lord you are seeking will come to his temple ; the courier of the compact ; whom you desire. will come. says the Lord Almighty. ’ However the people were anticipating a warrior. a physical male monarch. person who would liberate them from the yoke of the Romans – non a small town male child. possibly even an bastard one – people have long memories. The transition Jesus was reading was from the coil of Isaiah. chapter 61.

He bought the reading to an terminal in what. for the fold. would be considered ‘the incorrect place’ . i. e half manner through what is in modern Bibles. poetry 2 of the chapter. He includes the phrase ‘to proclaim the twelvemonth of the Lord’s favour’ but omits the 1 after it ‘the twenty-four hours of retribution of our God. ’ These people wanted a powerful Jesus who would free them of Roman subjugation. Isaiah’s prognostication goes on to speak about a dual part for the Hebrewss who would feed on the wealth of states. Preaching good intelligence to the hapless was all right. but it wouldn’t direct the Romans back to Rome.

Don Swager in his commentary says: – Jesus’ congratulations for “outsiders” caused them offense because they were blind-sighted to God’s clemency and program of salvation for all states. This sudden alteration of temper from the old poetries in which Luke records that he found credence where of all time he went is a polar point in the Gospel record. It exemplifies what will come and so can be said to put the docket – for case on Palm Sunday we are told that a big crowd ‘began to thank God and praise him in loud voices for all the great things that they had seen. ’ Shouting “Blessed is the male monarch who comes in the name of the Lord!

Peace in Eden and glorification in the highest! ” This is followed instantly by a supplication from the Pharisees that Jesus name upon his followings to be quiet. Presumably they feared a negative reaction on the portion of the governments to person being hailed as male monarch. It isn’t merely the words used. Spreading vesture along his manner was known to be the manner to recognize a male monarch. An illustration of this would be 2 Kings 9 V 13. a transition that would hold been known when to many in the crowd. where. and had anointed him. after Elisha had told his that God wanted him to be king Jehu told his officers that Elisha had said: –

Here is what he told me: ‘This is what the LORD says: I anoint you king over Israel. ’They rapidly took their cloaks and distribute them under him on the au naturel stairss. Then they blew the cornet and shouted. “Jehu is king! But the words were from what are called the ‘songs of ascent’ i. e a normal portion of the Passover jubilations and American ginseng every twelvemonth by pilgrims geting in Jerusalem for the banquet. So any Roman perceivers would hold likely seen nil unusual. and wouldn’t have been familiar with the transition from 2nd Kings. As with so many other transitions this reaction of the Pharisees is alone to Luke.

But these people were cognizant to some extent at least of the miracle that Jesus had performed in Galilee and the Resurrection of Lazarus. recorded by John the revivalist. though non by Luke. had merely merely occurred. John places the event possibly a hebdomad before. and it would surely hold been the latest intelligence. so they at least were cognizant of the particular individual that Jesus was. These same people. described by Luke as adherents would hold class still been in Jerusalem at the terminal of the hebdomad and some at least must hold been in the crowd which Luke describes: – With one voice they cried out. “Away with this adult male!

Release Barabbas to us! “… . . But they kept shouting. “Crucify him! Crucify him! “…… . But with loud cries they insistently demanded that he be crucified. and their cries prevailed. 24 So Pilate decided to allow their demand. This changeless split in sentiment and alterations in sentiment. the general misinterpretation about what was Jesus’ true ministry as recorded foremost in Luke 4. continues throughout the transitions between so and the test narrative. In Luke 5 for case there is the narrative of the call of Levi ( Matthew ) after which there was a banquet in Levi’s house.

Again it is the Pharisees who complain ‘But the Pharisees and the instructors of the jurisprudence who belonged to their religious order complained to his adherents. “Why do you eat and imbibe with revenue enhancement aggregators and evildoers? ” He tries to explicate: – “It is non the healthy who need a physician. but the ill. 32 I have non come to name the righteous. but evildoers to repentance. ” The Good News Bible translate this poetry as ‘I have non come to name respectable people to atone. but outcasts. ’ – which links back to the Isaiah transition read by Jesus in his place temple: –

He has anointed me to proclaim good intelligence to the hapless. He has sent me to proclaim freedom for the captives and recovery of sight for the blind. to put the laden free. That transition of class begins ‘the Spirit of the Lord is on me’ and of Jesus this was literally true if the history of the descent of the Holy Spirit upon him at the clip of his baptism is to be believed. It was acknowledge by Luke at the really beginning of the Galilean ministry: -“ Jesus returned to Galilee in the power of the Spirit. and intelligence about him spread through the whole countryside. ”

The transition. which comes from Isaiah 61 would non hold originally hold had the chapter and poetry interruptions with which we are so familiar. The subdivision instantly before it is headed in the New International Version ‘The Glory of Zion’ . and begins ‘Arise. radiance. for your visible radiation has come. and the glorification of the Lord rises upon you’ . Oswald Chambers noticing upon his book ‘My Utmost for his Highest’ notes that ‘We have to do the first step’…’when acquiring in contact with God in order to happen out what he wants’ . This is a long positive transition which includes mentions to God looking and states ( I.

e. the Gentiles ) coming to his visible radiation and which concludes with the words ‘I am the Lord ; in its clip I will make this fleetly. . ’ . Jesus. although he read merely a few lines. would hold been really cognizant of this wider context. and so would many of his readers. This ministry to the foreigners of society would go on and is more strongly apparent in this Gospel possibly than in others as for case in chapter 15. known for its fables of the doomed which begins with revenue enhancement aggregators and others on the borders of society coming to Jesus an event that brings an immediate reaction from the spiritual leaders

Right at the beginning of his narrative Luke had stressed the presence. power and working of the Holy Spirit. something that it was by and large felt had departed from Israel. The angel answered. “The Holy Spirit will come upon you. and the power of the Most High will dominate you. So the sanctum one to be born will be called the Son of God. This accent upon the Spirit continues. It is evidenced for case in the raising from decease to life of the widow’s boy. merely one of many healings which took topographic point and which Luke summarizes.

At that really clip Jesus cured many who had diseases. illnesss and evil liquors. and gave sight to many who were blind. 22 So he replied to the couriers. “Go back and study to John what you have seen and heard: The unsighted receive sight. the square walk. those who have leprosy are cleansed. the deaf hear. the dead are raised. and the good intelligence is proclaimed to the hapless. Even such marvelous events could be misinterpreted. such were the misinterpretations environing Jesus. who he was. and what his intent was.

In the gospel’s11th chapter. Jesus. now on his manner towards Jerusalem. drives out a devil. : – The nazarene was driving out a devil that was deaf-and-dumb person. When the devil left. the adult male who had been tongueless radius. and the crowd was amazed. 15 But some of them said. “By Beelzebul. the prince of devils. he is driving out devils. ” This empowering by the Spirit was non restricted to Jesus entirely. Expecting resistance in front he tells his followings they need non fear: – When you are brought before temples. swayers and governments. do non

concern about how you will support yourselves or what you will state. for the Holy Spirit will learn you at that clip what you should state. Another facet of the transition is ‘the adhering up of the broken hearted’ . This could be seen as mentioning to those who mourn for whatever ground as in Matthew 5 V 4 ‘Blessed are those who mourn for they shall be comforted. ’ as Jesus describes life in the coming land of God. The Message Bible has this as: – You’re blessed when you get your inside universe – your head and bosom – put right. Then you can see God in the outside universe.

Luke is ever concerned with world to the full recognizing who Christ is and his intent and the message might be. The missive to Philippians in chapter 2 contains a citation from an early Christian anthem which explains this – that Christ humbled himself by coming to earth in order finally that adult male will be restored in his relationship with God – a relationship broken in the early chapters of Genesis when adult male disobeyed what he knew to be the will of God. Luke portrays the intent of Christ as reconstructing this broken relationship. In 4 V 43 Jesus says: –

I must prophesy the good intelligence of the Kingdom to God to the other towns besides. because that is why I was sent. Luke besides shows the catholicity of the undertaking in the call of the adherents as when he responds to Peter in 5 V 10. ‘Don’t be afraid ; from now on you will catch men’ told. When the 70 two adherents. who had been sent out as recorded in chapter 10. they had been told ‘Heal the sick who are at that place and state them the land of God is near you’ They returned full of joy because ‘Lord. even the Satans submit to us in your name! ’

This thought that the spread of the Gospel is the undertaking and duty of the whole church. and they will be empowered by the Holy Spirit to transport it out is of class continued in Luke’s 2nd volume. the Book of Acts. for illustration in chapter 2 V 4: – All of them were filled with the Holy Spirit and began to talk in other linguas as the Spirit enabled them. This thought of reconstructing relationships is shown repeatedly even in the healing miracles. where the accent is on the forgiveness of wickednesss instead than on any physical healing that took topographic point as with the healing of the paralytic adult male brought to his by friends in 5 V 17 -26.

The adult male does have healing. but even before that in verse 20 we read: – ‘Friend. your wickednesss are forgiven’ something that the Judaic religion believed was merely brought approximately by the offering of forfeits. The consequence in this instance was non merely one adult male being forgiven. but a whole crowd of people seeing God in power and praising him for it. The subject continues even on the cross when the stealer pleads with the deceasing Messiah: – ‘Jesus. retrieve me when you come into your kingdom’ . Jesus answered him. ‘I Tell you the truth. today you will be with me in Eden.

When John records Jesus concluding words. ‘It is finished’ it is a mark that non merely is his earthly life pulling to an terminal. but that of the undertaking which he had taken upon himself. Peterson. in the Message Bible translates this as: -‘It’s done – complete’ . A phrase that might be translated as ‘It is accomplished’ as so it was if one accepted that by his sacrificial decease Jesus is able to reconstruct the relationship between God and his redemption. Luke’s version of the gospel narrative can non be seen in isolation. and should be read alongside complementary transitions. I.

e. the other Gospels. It is stated in John 3 V 14 – 18 a: – The boy of Man must be lifted up. that everyone who believes in him may hold ageless life. For God so loved the universe that he gave his 1 and merely boy that whoever believes in him shall non die but have ageless life. For God did non direct his boy into the universe to reprobate the universe. but to salvage the universe through him. Whoever believes in him is non condemned.


Bible. Good News Version. Today’s English Version. Collins/Fontana London 1976 Bible. New International Version. Hodder and Stoughton. London. 1988 Chambers. O. . My Utmost for His Highest. Marshall. Morgan and Scott. reprinted 1975 Peterson. E. Bible. The Message. Navpress. Colorado Springs. 2002. Richardson. A. Introduction to the Theology of the New Testament. SCM Press. London 1958 Electronic Sources Amplified Bible. retrieved 6th April 2009 hypertext transfer protocol: //www. biblegateway. com/passage/ ? search=Luke % 204 ; & A ; version=45 ; Brow. R. . Lukes Gospel Commentary. Retrieved 6th April 2009 hypertext transfer protocol: //www. forehead. on. ca/Books/Luke/Luke01. htm Conzelmann. H. and Buswell. G.

‘The Theology of St Luke’ Faber and Faber. London 1992. Questia on Line Library. retrieved 7th April 2009 hypertext transfer protocol: //www. questia. com/read/87968381? title=The % 20Theology % 20of % 20St. % 20Luke Racine. J. Luke: Storyteller. Interpreter and Evangelist. Theological Studies. Volume 69. 2008. Questia Online Library. retrieved 7th April 2009 hypertext transfer protocol: //www. questia. com/read/5025752564? title=Luke % 3a % 20Storyteller % 2c % 20Interpreter % 2c % 20Evangelist Swager. D. The Gospel of Luke. A Commentary and Meditation retrieved 6th April 2009 hypertext transfer protocol: //www. rc. net/wcc/readings/luke146. htm

Post Author: admin