Site Loader

“The universe is excessively much with us is a statement about struggle between nature and humanity. ” I agree with this statement to a big extent because that is precisely the chief premiss of the verse form written by William Wordsworth. The struggle in kernel. is the 1 where the human race no longer appreciates nature and alternatively exploits it for their ain stuff addition. However. the 3rd sentence within the transition is merely half right. I say this because it starts off sanely plenty. i. e. “He longs for a simpler time…” This is really true. It so is. However. the writer so proceeds to state. “…when the advancement of humanity was tempered by the limitation nature imposed. ” My ground for differing with this subdivision is that in the olden yearss. nature was worshipped by the Pagans who were in bend. frequently ostracized by the remainder of the community because of their beliefs. Nature did non enforce any limitations. Rather. determinations were based upon it because of the human head and inherent aptitude. non because nature conflicted with humanity.

The writer so moves on to depict in item. man’s reaction and behavior towards nature. He states it in an highly graceful. beautiful manner. “‘We have given our Black Marias away’ ( 4 ) means that we have sold the portion of us that is from the Earth ( adult male which is from the dust ) in order to do other things more of import than appreciating life…” ( lines 6 – 9 ) . Besides. Wordsworth decidedly describes human outlook and inherent aptitude as “powers” . i. e. things of strength. However. as human existences “we laic waste our powers” ( line 2 ) . The human race is excessively concerned with material wealth and would make anything ( including immoral actions ) to derive such wealths. Rather than pattern virtuousness and fortitude. humanity is unethical while seeking to profit itself.

Yet. though I may hold with a figure of the statements given. I wholly disagree with others. One of them is decidedly the 1 located in lines 22 – 24. “The destructiveness society has on the environment will continue freely and merciless like the “winds that will be ululating at all hours” ( line 6 ) . The ground why I strongly disagree with this statement is because Wordsworth was non doing a comparing between humanity and the destructiveness of strong air currents. He was simply depicting all the statelinesss that exist within our environment and the ways in which work forces ignore them. I say this because in the verse form. he so goes on to state. “For this. for everything. we are out of melody ; It moves us not…” ( lines 8 and 9 ) . Humanity is non moved by the about religious beauty and eclectic strength of nature and the elements that exist within it.

Wordsworth decidedly “sees himself as one with the environment. ” It is simply pointed out in lines 11 and 12. However. his unity with nature can be detected throughout the full sonnet. A individual who has studied this poet’s works will cognize that he reveres nature and looks at it about as if it were God Himself. Wordsworth thinks that he has no portion to play in the devastation of England’s natural environment. Alternatively. he is appealing with an apparent modulation of sorrow and sorrow. to the other citizens to do them halt the gratuitous devastation and ruin.

Here comes the portion that I disagree with to some extent. The portion where the writer says. “…the alteration Wordsworth is trusting for will come in the signifier of a mighty rebellion by nature. ” Yes. he talks about the ancient Gods. Proteus and Triton who both represent H2O and the rhenium – birth of world. However. this rhenium – birth won’t needfully be brought approximately by a rebellion. Wordsworth is simply saying that people will get down to pay more attending to the beauty of nature if its strength and enigmas are revealed in greater item. Though. due to extended research and old cognition. I do cognize that the information provided about the Supreme beings by the writer. were of sound and merely truth.

Both Gods are all – powerful and all – cognizing when it comes to the ocean and its enigmas. One can alter his visual aspect and the other can cite the animals from the deepnesss by one blow of his shell. Probably if they can command the ocean and its animals. they can command the heads of work forces? That’s one manner of believing about it.

The writer of the piece besides says that Wordsworth thinks the thought of Paganism ( and being ostracized by the Christian community ) is more appealing than the modern universe because so at least. he would be able to to the full worship nature and appreciate its beauty. This manner he can at least. acquire a good position of these mighty sea – Gods and chew over about all the enigmas that lay beneath the moving ridges. Wordsworth feels at one with nature and this is what the writer stressed upon when he says. “Wordsworth’s usage of symbolism in his verse form illustrates a sense of the strong belief and deep feelings he had toward nature…” This is really much true because he compares about every component of nature to religious and olympian existences.

“The mercenary advancement being made by world is non without effect. and the devastation of the environment by mankind’s myopia will go on as Wordsworth has foreseen. ” The above statement is really true. Simply intending that the laying waste of nature by adult male will go on for old ages to come. Hence. the first line of the verse form. “The World is excessively much with us ; late and soon…” Destruction was taking topographic point so and as the poet has predicted. it is still seen all over the universe up to this twenty-four hours.

However. as I mentioned earlier. there is no topographic point within the sonnet where Wordsworth speaks of a rebellion. This is decidedly non apparent to my oculus. What I see is simply a poet’s reading of nature and the positions most people choose to disregard in mundane life. Probably nature will get down a rebellion. likely it wouldn’t. But there is no grounds of this within the piece of poesy.

In decision. there was equal understanding and dissension refering my reading and the author’s reading of the sonnet “The World is Too much with Us. ” However. I would besides wish to advert to my intended audience that. all people are entitled to their sentiments and positions. and though I disagreed with the writer in some instances. I am non insinuating that his premises were incorrect or worthless.

Post Author: admin

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *